Coca-Cola’s guerilla marketing stunt, designed to capitalize on the remaining days of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, backfired within hours, resulting in a widespread backlash from New Orleans residents.
What happened? An ad agency employed by Coke hired several sidewalk graffiti artists to stencil and paint red logos with accompanying ad slogans on sidewalks and concrete surfaces throughout the city’s French Quarter and Central Business District.
Apparently, the graffiti application violated a number of city ordinances, including a city law that bars “posted or painted advertisement on any street, sidewalk, public buildings, utility poles, light standards, street signs, parking meters, trees located in public rights-of-way,” writes Michelle Krupa for The Times-Picayune.
New Orleans officials ordered Coke to remove the logos with power-washing by Friday afternoon.
A large number of New Orleans residents expressed outrage at the marketing stunt. In a letter to city officials, NOLAFemmes’ LunaNola wrote, “I ask, is this really how we want companies to behave when our city hosts national events?”
Coca-Cola was quick to apologize “and blamed the outside agency for exceeding its directions,” writes Michael McCarthy for USA Today.
Additionally, McCarthy reports that Coca-Cola has already removed the illegal advertising, as stated in an email sent by Ryan Berni, press secretary for New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu.
“ ‘We’re moving expeditiously to remove them,’” said Kel Villarrubia, a Coke spokesman based in Jefferson Parish, as quoted in the Times-Picayune story. “ ‘We very much respect the integrity of our historic districts in New Orleans.’”
Villarrubia added that the beverage company didn’t give the ad agency the green light on the marketing stunt, a claim disputed by some.
“It’s a classic case of corporate cowardice,” writes Paul Lukas on UniWatch. “Outsource the dirty work to some small-times and then hang them out to dry when the shit hits the fan, all while feigning surprise and regret over the way things turned out.”
Interesting—the same thing happened with the Belvedere Vodka campaign that appeared to make light of rape. The brand didn’t take responsibility for approving the campaign and threw the agency anonymously under the bus. Funny thing, we work with lots of clients and can’t imagine launching an initiative like either one of these without full consent and approval from clients—before proceeding to execute. Is it really so difficult to screw up and just take responsibility?
What do you think? Does this kind of thing even make it to your radar screen or is it just me that gets crazy about stuff like this? Would love to know your thoughts.
Image via Inhabitat
Shelly Kramer is a Principal Analyst and Founding Partner at Futurum Research. A serial entrepreneur with a technology centric focus, she has worked alongside some of the world’s largest brands to embrace disruption and spur innovation, understand and address the realities of the connected customer, and help navigate the process of digital transformation. She brings 20 years’ experience as a brand strategist to her work at Futurum, and has deep experience helping global companies with marketing challenges, GTM strategies, messaging develoment, and driving strategy and digital transformation for B2B brands across multiple verticals. Shelly’s coverage areas include Collaboration/CX/SaaS, platforms, ESG, and Cybersecurity, as well as topics and trends related to the Future of Work, the transformation of the workplace and how people and technology are driving that transformation. A transplanted New Yorker, she has learned to love life in the Midwest, and has firsthand experience that some of the most innovative minds and most successful companies in the world also happen to live in “flyover country.”
